To all,
Thanks for any and all comments re: article on Wikipedia. I would like to just make a few comments about same, just to "state my case".
An article on Wikipedia is
important; it provides a quickly accessible place for users to gain a little information about AkelPad, and access the homepage, etc. "Just look it up on Wikipedia" - we all have done THAT!
I would
love to add a fully detailed page about AkelPad - I wouldn't spend the time doing this (and the documentation!) if I didn't love it!
But...
Wikipedia has some guidelines for content, and mechanisms for
complete deletion of a page. One of their principles can be stated as follows:
Wikipedia wrote:Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion
It can be tempting to write about yourself or projects in which you have a strong personal involvement. However, do remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other, including the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which is difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you.
Articles that do not meet notability and do not cite reliable published sources are likely to be deleted.
The bottom line is that I want to be careful not to say "too much" - they could view that as "self-promotion". If a person clicks on a Wikipedia article and gets a "warning box", they might get turned off right away. Some examples of what I am talking about are:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_FLOW
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notepad2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmer%27s_Notepad
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RText
All these editors "might" be wonderful (I actually have tried 2 of these in the past and found them acceptable), but the Wikipedia warning is
bad. Worst of all would be if the article actually did get
deleted!
I will try to add a
few things to the article, but I am very conscious of the danger of going too far.
Thanks again for all your comments and support.