Status set to Modified after pressing No to reloading file
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 12:40 pm
AkelPad version I am currently using: 4.9.3 (x64)
When you work on a file that's been modified elsewhere - you get a prompt as soon as the AkelPad window receives (re-receives) focus. You're asked if to reload - and if I click no, the status bar says that the file is Modified.
The modified status of the current file in the buffer did not use to change e.g. in version 4.7.7 (x86).
The reason I don't believe it should change is that if you actually have saved the file and you're told that the file is modified and if you want to reload, pressing "No", if there is no "Modified" in the status bar, then you know that whatever has modified your file has done so on an updated version. Just a small peace of mind.
Also I believe I've reported this before: if AkelPad detects that the file has been modified externally, it should ask the user if to reload, BUT WARN THEM that reloading WILL LOSE THEIR CHANGES in the buffer (*if* the file has also been modified in the buffer, that is).
Am I making a fuss or is this reasonable? I believe it is a reasonable request.
When you work on a file that's been modified elsewhere - you get a prompt as soon as the AkelPad window receives (re-receives) focus. You're asked if to reload - and if I click no, the status bar says that the file is Modified.
The modified status of the current file in the buffer did not use to change e.g. in version 4.7.7 (x86).
The reason I don't believe it should change is that if you actually have saved the file and you're told that the file is modified and if you want to reload, pressing "No", if there is no "Modified" in the status bar, then you know that whatever has modified your file has done so on an updated version. Just a small peace of mind.
Also I believe I've reported this before: if AkelPad detects that the file has been modified externally, it should ask the user if to reload, BUT WARN THEM that reloading WILL LOSE THEIR CHANGES in the buffer (*if* the file has also been modified in the buffer, that is).
Am I making a fuss or is this reasonable? I believe it is a reasonable request.